Could
some Canadian homeowners soon be evicted due to a recent controversial court ruling?
Apparently,
it’s no longer enough to simply issue trite land acknowledgments thanking the
descendants of Stone Age peoples "for allowing us to meet and learn
together on their territory." Apparently, it is no longer enough to
acknowledge that, say, “we stand here on stolen lands that originally belonged
to the [insert your local indigenous peoples’ name here], who have made
immeasurably great contributions to every facet of life in our
[nation/region/province/state/community].”
Due
to an August ruling by Justice Barbara Young of the B.C. Supreme Court, residents
of Richmond, British Columbia, could conceivably have to give up their homes
and hit the road. After an extraordinarily lengthy trial and hearings that
spanned more than a decade, Young ruled that the Cowichan Tribes have
aboriginal title to the land in question. According to The Blaze, the Cowichan
Tribes, which consist of around 5,500 souls, “brought a legal action several
years ago against the Canadian federal government, the Province of British
Columbia, the City of Richmond, and other parties, seeking a declaration of
aboriginal title to 1,846 acres of land in Richmond.” How consequential was
this ruling? Dwight Newman, a professor of law at the University of
Saskatchewan, stated of the tribes: "If the law from this decision were
maintained, it would be possible for them to pursue a claim against private
residents too. Private residents might have some different defenses, but we
don't know how that plays out."
When
asked what this could ultimately mean for non-Indian homeowners on the affected
parcel of land, Newman added, "The fact I can't give you an answer with
any certainty is maybe the most concerning part. This could all play out in
various ways." Justice Young’s decision has been appealed by the province
of British Columbia, the City of Richmond, and two other Indian tribes.
Only a “progressive” could demand that we welcome any and
all illegal immigrants into the U.S. (or Canada, Western Europe, etc.), while
at the same time demanding that we read stolen ‘land acknowledgement’
statements and apologize to an erstwhile semi-nomadic “indigenous” people for
infringing on their territory.
No comments:
Post a Comment