“Muhammad” was the top choice for
parents naming their baby boys in England and Wales in 2023, with more than 4,600 children registered with
the name, out of all possible choices. Moreover, there are several common
spellings of the name, meaning that, in one form or another, it is even more
widespread than the report, issued by the Office for National Statistics
indicated. Muhammad is now the most common name for baby boys in Germany, too.
And it is in the top 10 for boys’ names in the (formerly) United States.
In the U.K., Muhammad has been among
the top 10 names for baby boys since 2016, but has now overtaken “Noah” for the
top spot according to the O.N.S..
Think about that. Think about the
symbolism of Muhammad overtaking Noah. In The West. For those of you who aren’t
familiar with the Bible, Noah “was a righteous man, the only blameless person
living on earth at the time, and he walked in close fellowship with God. Now
God saw that the earth had become corrupt and was filled with
violence. God observed all this corruption in the world, for everyone on
earth was corrupt.” As punishment for disobeying Him, He would visit a great
flood upon the earth and its inhabitants. God told Noah to build an ark. And so
he did. He took his wife, three sons, and their wives with him. And, of course,
the animals.
By contrast, Muhammad had several
wives over time, one of whom was apparently 6-years-old when betrothed, 9 when
the ‘marriage’ was consummated. Noah took a diversity of animals on the ark,
hoping to see to the repopulating of the earth. Christianity urges its adherents
to love one another, even one’s enemies. Sharia law calls for devout Muslims to
convert, enslave, or kill non-Muslims, i.e. “infidels.”
Once common Biblical names such as
John, Abraham, Mary, and Esther are becoming ever scarcer in the West. They are
being replaced by ‘hip’ and non-binary names like Max, Bailey, Quinn, and Sage.
And, of course, Muhammad.
While there is nothing inherently
wrong with this trend, a name like “Mohammed Muhammed Mohammad” doesn’t exactly
shout diversity and inclusion. Neither does Sharia law.
Yet there is a burgeoning—and bizarre—partnership
of sorts between hyper-secular progressives and radicalized Muslims, both of
whom seem hell bent on fundamentally transforming the U.S.—or destroying it
outright. The combination of cultural degradation, Marxism, and Sharia law
would be fatal to all Western nations if not aggressively opposed. Ironically,
if progressives and devout Muslims were successful in their power grab, they
could not possibly co-exist, one would have to utterly defeat the other.
Better to go back to the Biblical
roots of our founding. Better to be that shining city on a hill.
No comments:
Post a Comment